Cox v. Cox

762 A.2d 1040 (2000)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Facts

W and Harry (H) were married for 22 years. H worked as a crane operator earning approximately $120,000 per year in gross salary, including regular overtime, or approximately $7,800 per month net of taxes and other mandated deductions. After their child completed the first grade, W returned to work and earned approximately $13,000 to $14,000 per year working at various part-time jobs. In 1989, W began attending Rutgers University and earned her undergraduate degree in 1995. She earned approximately $6,000 a year while going to school. W enrolled in law school and obtained a law degree in 1998. She incurred $100,000 in debt and did not work. W failed the bar 3 times, and while earning $33,000 at a law firm, she was terminated. W rented an apartment for work. During the marriage, H worked approximately eighty to ninety hours per week. At the time of trial, he earned $25 per hour but claimed that the mental and physical stress of the job has started to take a toll on his health. The judge found that this was a long-term marriage, and there was a substantial disparity between the parties' incomes. The judge ordered limited duration alimony in the amount of $200 per week for a period of five years 'to enable W to establish herself as an attorney.' The judge also ordered that the award is to be reviewed in two years. W appealed.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.