Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Ps filed a petition against Ds in state circuit court. P alleges that D, through conduct including, but not limited to, the manufacture, advertising, sale and promotion of tobacco products in the state of Missouri, have caused damage to Ps. Ps allege that they have suffered damage, because the defendants fraudulently and falsely promoted, advertised, and sold highly addictive tobacco products that cause lung cancer, throat cancer, emphysema, heart disease, and other diseases. Ps claim that in discharging their governmental public benefit functions, they were required to provide unreimbursed healthcare to Medicaid and medically indigent patients for these tobacco-related illnesses caused by Ds' addictive tobacco products. D removed the action alleging diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Defendants allege that diversity of jurisdiction exists in this case because plaintiffs have fraudulently joined the Distributor Defendants in this cause of action for the purpose of ensuring state court jurisdiction. P filed a motion to remand the action to the Missouri court system, contending that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because they have established their causes of action against the Distributor Defendants.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.