Campolongo (P) through his executrix seeks compensatory and punitive damages. P alleged that he was exposed to an array of asbestos products and contracted mesothelioma. By a motion in limine, Celotex (D) moved for severance of strict liability claims which precludes the presentation of evidence directed towards a negligence theory as well as punitive damages. P objected to severance contending under 8(e)(2) that a trial limited to strict liability contravenes the rule and would seriously prejudice his direct case with no benefit to the court. P also contends that allowing severance will alter P’s burden of proof for proximate cause permitting scrutiny of P’s conduct and that of others while precluding an examination of D’s conduct.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.