Brumagim v. Bradshaw

39 Cal. 24 (1870)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

Dyson sued in ejectment but died, and the action was continued by Brumagim (P) his administrator. P alleged that he has possession of a tract of land called Potrero and that Bradshaw (D) was a trespasser without title. D denied the allegations. The evidence showed that Potrero was part of the San Francisco Peninsula and that in 1850, George and John Treat repaired a wall and a ditch so that the area was suitable for cattle and that they erected a gate, and built a small corral, and constructed a shanty for the gatekeeper and that they used the land for pasturage for hire. John relinquished his interests to George, and in 1852, George conveyed the land by deed to Dyson who brought the present suit. The matter went to trial and instructions were given to the jury. The verdict went to P and D appealed from error on the jury instruction.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.