The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

In 1974, I.R.M. (D) acquired an apartment building that was built in 1962. In 1978, Becker (P) was injured because he slipped and fell against an untempered shower door. D's maintenance man replaced 31 doors after the accident and stated that there was no way that a layperson could tell the difference between the tempered and untempered glass shower doors simply by looking. P sued, under strict liability. D claims that it is liable only for defects of which it had knowledge. The trial court granted D a summary judgment. P appealed.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.