Jeff Beard was abducted and brutally murdered by Stanley Robinson, a Chicago police officer. An F.B.I. informant, William O'Neal accompanied Robinson on the night of the murder. Robinson was convicted of the crime in 1973. P brought this suit against D, an F.B.I. agent who participated in the investigation of Robinson's activities. P alleges that D's reckless conduct of the Robinson investigation resulted in the deprivation of Jeff Beard's constitutional rights, giving rise to a Bivens action for damages. P introduced testimony to establish that D and O'Neal had a long-standing relationship. P established that in his role as informant O'Neal participated in criminal activities with other Black Panther Party (BPP) members and that D had knowledge of these activities. D also introduced evidence establishing that O'Neal was successful in preventing crimes on a number of occasions. O'Neal ceased activity as a BPP informant in early 1972. O'Neal and Robinson set out to perform a murder contract. Robinson only knew that the intended victim was a tall black man named Jeff with a high natural hairstyle. They eventually spotted their mark and Robinson killed Jeff Beard. P sued D. The trial judge permitted Kocoras, the Assistant U. S. Attorney assigned to the Robinson case, to testify at trial that D had a reputation for truthfulness. P contends that this was an impermissible use of reputation evidence under Rule 608(a).

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.