Able v. United States

44 F.3d 128 (2nd Cir. 1995)

Free access to 20,000 Casebriefs

Facts

Ps are six gay or lesbian members of the armed forces. Ps filed suit challenging the constitutionality of 10 U.S.C. 654(b)(2). P contends that this law violates Equal Protection. After the suit was filed, the DOD initiated an investigation of plaintiff, Petty Officer Heigl, based on his statement that he was a homosexual which was submitted to the district court in connection with this lawsuit. The district court issued an order on April 4, 1994 enjoining Ds from investigating or discharging or taking other adverse or punitive actions against Ps based on their self-identification as gay or lesbian in connection with these legal proceedings. D moves for an order vacating, altering, or amending the preliminary injunction and the district court denied that request. D then informed Ps that they intended to initiate discharge proceedings against two of them. Ps sought a second injunction and got that one. D appealed.

Nature Of The Case

This section contains the nature of the case and procedural background.

Issues

The legal issues presented in this case will be displayed here.

Holding & Decision

The court's holding and decision will be displayed here.

Legal Analysis

Legal analysis from Dean's Law Dictionary will be displayed here.

© 2007-2025 ABN Study Partner

© 2025 Casebriefsco.com. All Rights Reserved.