Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Ortiz (D) was accused of cocaine distribution and conspiracy to distribute. During the trial, the issue of D's prior conviction from two separate heroin sales for impeachment was brought before the trial court. The trial court ruled that the 1972 offenses committed just 4 years ago were admissible for purposes of impeachment. D claims Rule 609 (a) caused him to forego taking the stand and testifying on his own behalf. D was convicted and appealed.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co