Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Fearwell (D) was convicted for conspiracy to violate the Food Stamp Act. The prosecution (P) notified D before trial that if D testified, P would impeach his credibility by entering into evidence his prior conviction of petit larceny. The trial court ruled that it would allow this admission. D argued on appeal that admission of this crime should not have been allowed because under Rule 609, the prior crime must have involved dishonesty of a false statement for impeachment purposes, and his petit larceny was not such a crime.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co