Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Beasley (D) was a research chemist who acquired prescriptions for narcotics from several doctors, purportedly for the purpose of conducting experiments on vegetables. The government claimed that D actually sold the drugs. D was charged with seven counts of obtaining Dilaudid with intent to distribute. The offenses for which he was charged occurred over a 10-month period in 1980 and 1981. However, the prosecution offered evidence of D's drug activity occurring between 1981 and 1984. It argued that, although some of the events occurred after the offenses charged, they were admissible under Rule 404(b) to show pattern. The court repeatedly told the jury that the purpose of the evidence was to show D's 'intent.' D appealed his conviction.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co