Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Ewart (D) was a newspaper vendor and sold a copy of a paper containing obscene matter. At trial, D claimed that he honestly did not know that the obscene material was in the paper. The prosecution claimed that the anti-obscenity law was strict liability. The defense claimed that the prosecution was burdened to show that D knew what he was selling. D was convicted and appealed.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co