Sturm v. Chicago & Northern Western Railroa
157 F.2d 407 (8th Cir. 1946)
Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Sturm (P) was injured while employed by D. P sued and alleged that a brake used by D was inefficient and was the proximate result of his injuries. D's evidence showed the opposite was true. Neither party moved for a directed verdict at the close of evidence, and the issue was submitted to the jury with no exceptions taken by the trial judge's charges to the jury. Judgment was entered for D and P appealed.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co