Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Lawrence (D) was prosecuted for grand larceny in connection with the theft of an automobile. At the conclusion of evidence in D's trial, he moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that there had been no evidence of the value of the stolen car. Although the prosecution could have moved to reopen and supply the missing evidence, he instead argued that judicial notice of the car's value could be taken. The court denied D's motion and took judicial notice of the fact that the car was worth more than $50, thus justifying the charge of grand larceny. The car was a 1947 Ford Sedan.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co