Robbins v. Farmers Union Grain Terminal Associatio

552 F.2d 788 (8th Cir. 1977)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Robbins (P) was a partner in a cattle feeding operation. In the fall of 1971, the operation purchased calves and started them on a feeding program which included Rum-Liq. This was a feed supplement manufactured by Farmers Union Grain Terminal Association (D) which contained a high level of urea. There was a warning posted stating that cattle coming into a feedlot should be given 10 days to adjust to the stress before starting them on a full feeding program. However, P started the feed treatment immediately, gradually increasing the dosage. Some of the cattle got sick and died. Two calves were examined in December 1971, and a high level of ammonia was found in their blood. Believing it to be the result of urea feeding, P stopped giving the cattle Rum-Liq. After the cessation, the rate of death and sickness among his cattle decreased rapidly. P sued D, claiming the failure to give sufficient warnings regarding safe use of the feed. P also claimed that D should have known that experts recommended a longer delay than 10 days before starting calves on a full feeding program. P wanted to introduce a letter of subsequent remedial warning by D to its sales personnel under strict liability to show an unreasonably dangerous product, and under a negligence theory to show the feasibility of issuing the subsequent warning earlier. D was found liable. D appealed, contesting the admission of the letter of subsequent remedial warning by the trial court.