Revell v. Lido

317 F.3d 467, 469 (5th Cir. 2002).

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Lidov, an Assistant Professor of Pathology and Neurology at the Harvard Medical School and Children's Hospital, wrote an article on the subject of the terrorist bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, which exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988. The article alleges that a broad politically motivated conspiracy among senior members of the Reagan Administration lay behind their willful failure to stop the bombing despite clear advance warnings. Lidov charged that the government proceeded to cover up its receipt of advance warning and repeatedly misled the public about the facts. Lidov laid heavy criticism upon P, then Associate Deputy Director of the FBI, accusing him of complicity in the conspiracy and cover-up. Lidov charges that P, knowing about the imminent terrorist attack, made certain his son, previously booked on Pan Am 103, took a different flight. Lidov had never been to Texas, except possibly to change planes, or conducted business there, and was apparently unaware that P then resided in Texas. Lidov posted his article on a website maintained by its School of Journalism at Columbia University. The article could be viewed by members of the public over the internet. P, a resident of Texas, sued the University whose principal offices are in New York City, and Lidov, who is a Massachusetts resident, in the Northern District of Texas. Ds moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2). The district court granted Ds' motions, and P now appeals.