Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harj

565 F.3d 880 (D.C. Cir. 2009)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

See Pro-Football, Inc. v. Harjo 415 F.3d 44 (D.C. Cir. 2005) for the facts. On remand, the district court again found the defense of laches persuasive. It held that the seven-year, nine-month 'Romero Delay Period' evinced a lack of diligence on Romero's part. P appealed.