Pomeranz v. Mcdonald'

843 P.2d 1378 (1993)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

McDonalds (D) leased property from Tellar Arms, Inc., Pomeranz's (P) predecessor in interest. The property was in a shopping mall, and P and D mutually agreed to amend the lease to require D to pay taxes and maintenance costs in addition to rent. D remained in possession of the property until 1986 when it moved to another location. D then breached the lease agreement about 6 months later when it ceased making payments and was unable to sublease the property. P sued D for future rent, future taxes, and maintenance expenses. The only evidence presented by P for the other charges it was seeking was supplied by Theodore Pomeranz, the managing co-owner of the shopping center. Pomeranz testified that the future taxes would be about $48,363 through the end of the lease term based on the current rate and a 5% inflation adjustment and that future maintenance would amount to $35,407 based on an estimate of $4,800 per year with an annual increase of 5% for inflation. Pomeranz was not qualified as an expert in either the estimation of inflation rates, property taxes, or maintenance expenses. The court found for P on all issues. The court of appeals reversed the future taxes and maintenance expenses as they constituted hearsay and speculation and were insufficient to support an award of damages.