Mitchell v. Archibald & Kendall, Inc

573 F.2d 429 (7th Cir. 1978)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Mitchell (P) sued Archibald & Kendall, Inc. (D) because he was robbed at gunpoint when a delivery truck P was driving was told to wait alongside D's building on public land before unloading. P was shot with a 12-gauge shotgun from three feet and suffered permanent injuries. Prior to the incident against P, there were repeated occasions when D's employees had experienced various criminal acts; just three weeks earlier an armed robbery was perpetrated against another truck driver while parked on D's premises waiting to make a delivery just as P did. P claimed D knew or should have known of the risk of criminal attack and that D had violated a number of duties; the duty to exercise ordinary care to make its premises safe, the duty to provide a safe means of ingress and egress from the facilities, the duty to exercise reasonable care to protect P from known dangers, the duty to notify P of the dangers, the duty to keep its premises and the immediate adjacent areas reasonably well policed. The trial court dismissed the complaint for a failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.