Leumi Financial Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

295 F.Supp. 539 (1969)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

P was insured and alleged that he suffered losses as a result of unspecified conduct by an assistant vice-president. D contends that P discovered the losses in May 1966 but failed to give prompt written notice of loss and proof of claim as required by the insurer's bond. P notified D of possible losses in October 1966 and filed proof of claim in November. D objected to certain interrogatories which asked D to define dishonest act and fraudulent act and to state if certain specific acts are dishonest and fraudulent. D objected in that these asked for legal opinions.