Leumi Financial Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co
295 F.Supp. 539 (1969)
Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
P was insured and alleged that he suffered losses as a result of unspecified conduct by an assistant vice-president. D contends that P discovered the losses in May 1966 but failed to give prompt written notice of loss and proof of claim as required by the insurer's bond. P notified D of possible losses in October 1966 and filed proof of claim in November. D objected to certain interrogatories which asked D to define dishonest act and fraudulent act and to state if certain specific acts are dishonest and fraudulent. D objected in that these asked for legal opinions.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co