Lampert, Hausler, & Rodman Pc v. John F. Gallant, Et Al

18 Mass.L.Rptr. 614, 2004 WL 3120801

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

This was a fight among partners in a law firm over which lawyers get how much in fees from matters incomplete at the time of a split-up. The partners never expended the effort to create a written agreement addressing the division of unfinished business or the dissolution of the firm. D, a shareholder in Gallant, Hausler & Lampert, P.C., 'resigned' and certain clients followed him to his new firm. P has seized upon the close corporation status of the professional corporation and demands that D, still a shareholder, abide by his fiduciary duties. D established his new firm and is practicing law in the same town as P. P wants this considered a breach of his obligations to the corporation. Gallant, Hausler & Lampert, P.C. is clearly a closely held corporation. Consequently, the shareholders each have some significant degree of fiduciary duties to one another just like partners in a traditional partnership.