Klaassen v. Commissione

182 F.3d 932 (10th Cir. 1999)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Ps were the parents of ten dependent children. Ps earned an adjusted gross income (AGI) of $83,056.42. On Schedule A, the Klaassens claimed deductions for medical expenses and state and local taxes in the respective amounts of $4,767.13 and $3,263.56. Including their claimed deductions for interest and charitable contributions, their total Schedule A itemized deductions equaled $19,563.95. Therefore, they subtracted that amount from their AGI, and on line 35 of their Form 1040, they showed a balance of $63,492.47. On line 36, they entered a total of $29,400 for twelve personal exemptions-one each for themselves and their ten children. After subtracting that amount, they showed a taxable income of $34,092.47 on line 37 of their Form 1040, and a resulting regular tax of $5,111.00 on line 38. They did not provide any computations for AMT liability. The IRS issued a notice of deficiency, advising the Klaassens that they were liable for a $1,085.43 AMT pursuant to I.R.C. §§ 55-59. Specifically, the IRS concluded that, in the Klaassens' case, I.R.C. §§ 55-56 required three specific adjustments, or increases, to the taxable income which they showed on line 37 of their Form 1040. According to the IRS's interpretation, subsection 56(b)(1)(A)(ii) required the entire $3,263.56 deduction for state and local taxes to be added back. Next, subsection 56(b)(1)(B) reduced the deduction allowable for medical expenses by setting a 10% floor in lieu of the 7.5% floor normally allowed under §213(a)-resulting in a net adjustment of $2,076.41. Finally, § 56(b)(1)(E) deprived the Klaassens of the entire $29,400 deduction they claimed on line 36 of their Form 1040. After adjusting the taxable income by these three amounts, the IRS set the alternative minimum taxable income at $68,832.44. After deducting the $45,000 exemption, the tentative minimum tax was computed on the excess: 26% x $23,832.44 = $6,196.43. The difference between that figure and the Klaassens' regular tax was $1,085.43. The Tax Court affirmed, and Ps appealed.