Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Wright (D) was accused of sexually molesting two girls. The younger girl was interviewed by a physician. She made certain statements during this interview that incriminated D. D was charged with molestation of the two children. At trial, the younger girl did not testify, but the court admitted her prior statements. D objected to this admission for hearsay and Confrontation Clause reasons. The court's justification for using the statements was Idaho's residual hearsay rule, which permitted the introduction of hearsay evidence that has substantial indicia of reliability. The court found, based on other evidence heard at trial, that the statements were reliable. D was convicted. The state supreme court reversed, holding that the Confrontation Clause was violated. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co