Gardner v. Olso

1997 Wash.App. Lexis 1245 (1997)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Gardner (P) owned a successful CPA practice and decided to sell it. Olson (D) worked as a corporate CPA and was interested in moving into private practice. On September 13, 1994, P agreed to sell the business to D for $195,000 including $25,000 for furniture, fixtures, and equipment, and $170,000 for goodwill and a non-compete agreement. D agreed to pay $60,000 down and monthly installments of $1,687.20 beginning in February 1995. P took a security interest in the furniture, fixtures, and equipment to secure the remainder of the amounts owed. To finance his purchase, D gave Key Bank a security interest in all of the office fixtures and equipment in exchange for a SBA loan. P agreed to subordinate her interest to the Key Bank agreement. The parties executed an employment agreement that P would work as D’s employee beginning in October 1, 1995, and would be available to train him 15 hours per week. P gave D permission to use her name in conjunction with the business for one year. The relationship went south in November 1995. P sent D several letters which criticized work and appearance in the office and told D that he was not making an effort to learn the practice. The trial court found that these criticisms were part of P’s effort to train D. Eventually P told D he could not use her name. In response, D abandoned the business. P continued to run it under a reservation of rights clause. D stopped paying on the SBA loan, and Key Bank repossessed. P replaced the equipment at a cost of $50,000. P then sued D for a breach of contract and demanded specific performance. D counterclaimed in that P no longer allowed the use of her name. The case was tried on money damages. The court ruled that D was the breaching party and that P had incurred $35,000 in damages and $20,000 for repossessed furniture and equipment. It also found that P had received $70,297 in benefits. The court offset this by $11,713 for attorney fees and determined that P owed D $22,738.40 in restitution. P appealed.