Daniel J. Hartwig Associates, Inc. v. Kanne

913 F.2d 1213 (7th Cir. 1990)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

Hartwig (P) was a consultant to Kanner (D), an attorney, in three separate cases. D never paid P and P sued for a breach of contract. D defended on grounds that P made fraudulent misrepresentations and the contracts were thus void. At trial, P admitted that he had padded his resume and did not reveal a conflict of interest. P had indicated that he got a Bachelor of Science instead of a Bachelor of Arts degree. P also testified that he had verbally informed D of these matters prior to testifying in D's cases. D claimed that P never disclosed any potential conflicts in interest. D presented no evidence as he failed to appear. The district court entered a directed verdict in the amount of $44,225.04 for P. D appealed; the matter should have been submitted to the jury as a material issue of fact existed as to whether the contract was void based on misrepresentation.