Child Support Enforcement v. Brenckl

675 N.E.2d 390 (1997)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

H and W were married in 1964 in California and moved to Alaska in 1971. They had one child in Alaska who was born in 1974. In 1978 they divorced. W retained custody of the son and H agree to pay $500 per month in child support, and that support would terminate when the boy reached majority but that both H and W would share the expenses of his college education. In 1979, H moved to Massachusetts and made no child support payments since then. H claims that this was due to the fact that when he sent support payments, her home address was marked with an unclaimed designation and H assumed that W no longer wanted or needed the support. W did not pursue enforcement until her son prepared to go to college. W filed an action in 1991. H was given notice of the proceedings but did not appear. The court entered judgment against H for $75,000. W then filed under URESA to enforce the order in Massachusetts. H filed an answer to the petition and filed a motion to dismiss. That motion was denied. The judge found H liable for $107,365 (the judgment with interest). UIFSA was passed. H appealed.