Chesney v. Steven

644 A.2d 1240 (1994)

Purchase the Printed Copy at bsmsphd.com

Nature of the Case

To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.

Facts

In 1984, D leased a piece of residential property to P month to month. The dwelling was old, and its condition was reflected by the rent charged by D: $31.00 per month until 1988 and $46.00 per month thereafter. From 1984 through 1987, P made substantial improvements to the leased premises. These improvements included, inter alia: two new bathrooms, carpeting the floors, a new septic system, new windows, a new furnace, a new kitchen, wiring the entire house, two new porches, new plumbing, and painting the outside of the house. P never demanded or requested that D pay for these improvements. In April of 1991, D gave P fifteen days notice to vacate the leased premises. In response, P sued asking for a life estate in the leased premises; or alternatively, enter judgment against D for the value of the improvements they had made to the real estate. The court gave the judgment to P under the theory of unjust enrichment, to recover $11,790.00 for the improvements they had made to the leased realty. D appealed.