Nature of the Case
To access this section all you need to do is click here and register.
Facts
Howard (D) performed a sagittal split osteotomy on Payne (P). P alleged that it was performed in a negligent manner and without her informed consent. P took D's deposition, and D was requested to produce a number of documents related to his dental practice and private affairs. D refused on grounds of irrelevance of privilege. P then moved for a default judgment against D or in the alternative to compel him to make the requested discovery.
Support@ bsmsphd.com
Casebriefs Co